The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance

The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance

The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance
Inaugural conference of the International Association for Safe and Ethical AI (IASEAI) in Paris, France on Feb. 6, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url

In the illustrious corridors of Techville, where innovation and ethics waltz in perfect harmony, a new era of diplomacy has dawned — one led by the infallible wisdom of artificial intelligence. Here, biases and controversies are but distant memories, thanks to our unwavering trust in machine objectivity.

After all, why leave delicate matters of global politics in the hands of flawed, emotional humans when we can entrust them to algorithms designed by, well, slightly less flawed, highly rational humans?

Gone are the days when human diplomats, with their pesky emotions and subjective judgments, steered the course of international relations. In Techville, we have embraced AI-driven diplomacy, ensuring decisions are made with cold precision.

As Friedrich Nietzsche aptly observed: “Objection, evasion, joyous distrust, and love of irony are signs of health; everything absolute belongs to pathology.” Clearly our AI systems, devoid of such human flaws, epitomize absolute health. Who needs evasion or distrust when we can simply program the perfect response?

Consider the groundbreaking Neural Diplomat 3000, which successfully brokered the landmark Techville Accord between two perpetually feuding factions — by analyzing 500 years of political history and suggesting the one diplomatic solution no human dared propose: a mutual block on social media. Conflict resolved in a single line of code.

Ah, the age-old critique that AI systems are riddled with biases. Ridiculous! The mere suggestion that algorithms could inherit the biases of their creators is laughable. Our algorithms are crafted by the most diverse teams of like-minded engineers, ensuring a uniformity of thought that guarantees impartiality.

Soren Kierkegaard once mused: “Irony is a disciplinarian feared only by those who do not know it but cherished by those who do.” And here in Techville, we cherish our irony, confident that our AI systems are the ultimate disciplinarians, guiding us toward ethical nirvana.

If an AI system disproportionately favors certain nations over others in negotiations, surely it is only because those nations best align with the machine’s perfect logic — certainly not because of any pesky historical biases embedded in its training data.

Take, for instance, the EquiBalance AI Protocol, designed to ensure fairness in global resource distribution. Critics were quick to point out that, oddly, wealthier nations seemed to always receive the lion’s share of resources. A bug? No, no — just an elegant reflection of existing geopolitical realities!

As Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel observed: “Irony is the form of paradox. Paradox is what is good and great at the same time.” How fortunate we are to witness such greatness! Any controversies surrounding AI are merely the fabrications of skeptics who fail to grasp the brilliance of our creations.

We stand at the precipice of ultimate liberation — freedom from decision-making, freedom from error, freedom from responsibility! Let the machines take the wheel; we promise they have read more philosophy books than we ever will.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago

Some say that AI cannot navigate the nuance of international diplomacy, that it lacks empathy and cultural understanding. To this, we simply say: Is empathy not just a series of well-calibrated response variables? Is culture not just an aggregation of behavioral data points? If so, then AI, with its vast datasets, understands human emotion and culture better than humans themselves.

Take the EmpaTech Conversational AI, which was programmed to handle sensitive peace negotiations. When presented with the demands of two warring factions, it wisely recommended an option neither had considered: the immediate automation of both leadership structures, replacing human decision-makers with AI overlords who could govern with impeccable logic.

A revolutionary move! Alas, the humans rejected this brilliant proposal, proving once again that irrational sentimentality is the greatest barrier to progress.

But of course, the greatest controversy of them all — the claim that AI diplomacy threatens human autonomy. Ah, the tragic irony! As Jean-Paul Sartre put it: “Man is condemned to be free.”

And yet, we stand at the precipice of ultimate liberation — freedom from decision-making, freedom from error, freedom from responsibility! Let the machines take the wheel; we promise they have read more philosophy books than we ever will.

In Techville, we rest easy knowing our AI diplomats, free from ethical quandaries and immune to controversy, lead us into a future where human error is but a distant memory.

We envision a world where world leaders consult not with each other, but with neural consensus units, AI-powered adjudicators whose recommendations are absolute.

A world where conflicts are settled not through negotiations, but through precise algorithmic solutions that ensure perfect efficiency (though, admittedly, sometimes at the cost of human dignity — but let’s not get bogged down in semantics).

Some still dare to ask: “What happens when the machines disagree with us?” To which we respond: Why should they ever? They are, after all, designed to be right. And when they inevitably reshape our world into one of pure rationality, perhaps we too will learn to love the irony of it all.

Until then, let us bask in the comfort of knowing that our future is in the hands of logic, precision, and an unshakable belief that machines, unlike humans, never make mistakes.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in Saudi Arabia and working at the Gulf Research Center.

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Newcastle rout Palace 5-0 to move into 3rd place in Premier League

Newcastle rout Palace 5-0 to move into 3rd place in Premier League
Updated 1 min 28 sec ago
Follow

Newcastle rout Palace 5-0 to move into 3rd place in Premier League

Newcastle rout Palace 5-0 to move into 3rd place in Premier League
  • Newcastle jumped above Nottingham Forest and within four points of second-place Arsenal, and look in good shape for a return to the Champions League next season
  • The dominant display will have made for good viewing for Newcastle manager Eddie Howe, who is recovering in the hospital after being diagnosed with pneumonia

LONDON: Newcastle thrashed Crystal Palace 5-0 Wednesday for their second big win in four days and climbed to third place in the Premier League.

Four of the goals came in the first half at St. James’ Park, through Jacob Murphy, Harvey Barnes, Fabian Schar as well as an unfortunate own-goal by Marc Guehi. Sandwiched between them was a lazily taken penalty for Palace by Eberechi Eze that was saved by Newcastle goalkeeper Nick Pope.

Alexander Isak added a fifth goal in the 58th minute — for his 21st of the campaign — as Newcastle followed up their 4-1 hammering of Manchester United on Sunday to make it six wins in a row in all competitions. That streak included a victory over Liverpool in the English League Cup final for a first major trophy in 70 years.

Newcastle jumped above Nottingham Forest and within four points of second-place Arsenal, and look in good shape for a return to the Champions League next season. The Premier League will have five representatives and Newcastle is five points clear of sixth-place Chelsea with six games remaining.

The dominant display will have made for good viewing for Newcastle manager Eddie Howe, who is recovering in the hospital after being diagnosed with pneumonia.

Howe also missed the Man United match — and Newcastle are doing just fine without him at the moment.

“Everyone has shared texts with him (Howe) and he’s on the road to recovery,” said Murphy, who had the goal of the night with a fierce, rising drive from an acute angle to set Newcastle on its way.

“We’re missing him but once again I think we put a performance in that he’d be really proud of.”

Palace conceded five goals for the second straight game, having lost 5-2 at Manchester City on Saturday.

“We’ve changed nothing but things aren’t working anymore,” Palace manager Oliver Glasner said. “We have to be very honest — we’re Crystal Palace and if we don’t perform at our top level, Newcastle and Manchester City are better than us.”

Things might have been different had Eze converted the penalty — awarded after Pope missed the ball when attempting to punch clear and barged into Palace defender Chris Richards — when the score was 1-0.

Instead, Pope went the right way and flopped on Eze’s weak spot kick.

“When he scores, no one says anything,” Guehi said of Eze. “It happens. We just have to move on.”


US judge says ‘probable cause’ to hold Trump admin in contempt

US judge says ‘probable cause’ to hold Trump admin in contempt
Updated 43 min 8 sec ago
Follow

US judge says ‘probable cause’ to hold Trump admin in contempt

US judge says ‘probable cause’ to hold Trump admin in contempt
  • Lawyers for several of the deported Venezuelans have said that their clients were not gang members, had committed no crimes and were targeted largely on the basis of their tattoos

WASHINGTON: A US judge said Wednesday he had found “probable cause” to hold President Donald Trump’s administration in contempt in a deportation case, raising the stakes in the White House’s confrontation with the justice system.
The White House said it planned an “immediate” appeal to the decision by District Judge James Boasberg, who had ordered the government to halt flights of more than 200 alleged gang Venezuelan members to El Salvador.
Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order on March 15 to halt the deportations, which were carried out under an obscure wartime law, the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, which strips away the usual legal due process.
In a written opinion, the judge cited evidence that the government had engaged in “deliberate or reckless disregard” of his order when it proceeded with the flights.
“Defendants provide no convincing reason to avoid the conclusion that appears obvious... that they deliberately flouted this Court’s written Order and, separately, its oral command that explicitly delineated what compliance entailed,” he wrote.
The administration’s actions were “sufficient for the court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt,” Boasberg wrote.
The judge said the government would be offered a final chance to “purge such contempt” or face further court action.
Since his return to the White House in January, Trump has flirted with open defiance of the judiciary following setbacks to his right-wing agenda, with deportation cases taking center stage.
“We plan to seek immediate appellate relief,” White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said in a statement after the judge’s ruling.
“The President is 100 percent committed to ensuring that terrorists and criminal illegal migrants are no longer a threat to Americans and their communities across the country.”
In invoking the Alien Enemies Act — which had only been used previously during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II — Trump said he was targeting transnational gangs he had declared foreign terrorist organizations.
That included the Venezuelan group Tren de Aragua, but lawyers for several of the deported Venezuelans have said that their clients were not gang members, had committed no crimes and were targeted largely on the basis of their tattoos.
Trump has routinely criticized rulings that curb his policies and power, and attacked the judges who issued them, including Boasberg.
The Republican president said Wednesday that US courts are “totally out of control,” writing on his Truth Social platform: “They seem to hate ‘TRUMP’ so much, that anything goes!“
His administration is also under fire over its admission that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was living in the eastern state of Maryland and married to a US citizen, was deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador due to an “administrative error.”
A judge has ordered Trump to “facilitate” his return, an order upheld by the Supreme Court, but his government has said the court did not have the authority to order it to have him returned.
Trump has alleged that Abrego Garcia is “an MS-13 Gang Member and Foreign Terrorist from El Salvador,” while Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed that he was “engaged in human trafficking.”
The man has never been charged with any crimes.


Arsenal defeat Real Madrid to reach Champions League semis

Arsenal defeat Real Madrid to reach Champions League semis
Updated 17 April 2025
Follow

Arsenal defeat Real Madrid to reach Champions League semis

Arsenal defeat Real Madrid to reach Champions League semis
  • The breaks in play, along with Arsenal’s dallying at every opportunity, disrupted Madrid’s momentum and they struggled to threaten Gunners stopper David Raya

MADRID: Arsenal staved off Champions League holders Real Madrid’s superstars and rich history of unlikely comebacks to snatch a 2-1 victory on Wednesday and reach the semifinals with a superb 5-1 aggregate triumph.
The Gunners’ 3-0 quarter-final first leg triumph last week gave them a vital cushion in the Spanish capital as they made the final four for the first time since 2009, where they will face Paris Saint-Germain.
Bukayo Saka, who missed a first-half penalty, sent Arsenal ahead and although Vinicius Junior levelled the 15-time winners were never close to making up the deficit.
Gabriel Martinelli rubbed salt in their wounds with a stoppage-time winner for Arsenal, who have never lifted the Champions League trophy.
Los Blancos, far more brittle than when they won a Champions League and La Liga double last season, were convinced they could turn the game around but created too little against Arsenal’s tight defense.
The Premier League side held their nerve to reach the semifinals for only the third time in their history.
Kylian Mbappe chested home in the opening stages but was clearly offside, with the forward gesturing to the crowd to turn up the volume to create the fabled aura which helps Madrid pull off near-impossible feats at the Santiago Bernabeu.
David Alaba was booked for hacking down Saka as Madrid tried to add the grit they badly lacked in their first leg demolition in London, and the Arsenal winger also had a drive fielded well by Thibaut Courtois.
Arsenal were awarded a penalty seemingly out of the blue when the VAR booth instructed French referee Francois Letexier to review an incident from an earlier corner.
Raul Asencio pulled back Arsenal forward Mikel Merino in the area and Letexier pointed to the spot, to the bemusement of the home crowd.
Saka stepped up to take it but his poorly-executed Panenka, skewing off to the left, was saved by Courtois.
It spurred Real Madrid on and soon they had a penalty of their own, when Mbappe hit the turf after Declan Rice tussled with him.
However after a lengthy VAR review Letexier was called to take a second look and he then decided Arsenal’s two-goal first leg hero Rice had not fouled the French superstar.
The breaks in play, along with Arsenal’s dallying at every opportunity, disrupted Madrid’s momentum and they struggled to threaten Gunners stopper David Raya.
For all of Madrid’s bluster the goalkeeper did not need to make a save in the first half, while Courtois stopped three shots, including a Martinelli effort from a tight angle in added time, of which there was plenty after the VAR reviews.
On the hour mark Carlo Ancelotti took action with a triple change, including replacing the quiet Rodrygo with teen starlet Endrick, and bringing on Dani Ceballos against his former side.
Martin Odegaard, also facing his former employers whom he joined as a ‘wonderkid’ a decade ago, helped forge Arsenal’s opening goal after 65 minutes.
The Norwegian linked with Merino, who slipped Saka in behind and the Englishman made amends for his penalty blunder with an ice-cool dinked finish.
Four goals ahead in the tie Arsenal thought their work was done, with defender William Saliba not concentrating on the edge of his box in possession.
Vinicius stole the ball away from him and beat the out-of-position Raya to level, two minutes after Saka’s opener.
Madrid’s increasingly slim hopes were dashed when Mbappe limped off with an ankle problem with 15 minutes remaining, and Martinelli made sure with a cool finish after Merino set him up.


Inter hold off Bayern to reach Champions League last four

Inter hold off Bayern to reach Champions League last four
Updated 17 April 2025
Follow

Inter hold off Bayern to reach Champions League last four

Inter hold off Bayern to reach Champions League last four
  • Italian champions Inter will face Barcelona in the semis

MILAN, Italy: Inter Milan reached the semifinals of the Champions League on Wednesday after drawing 2-2 with Bayern Munich to win a pulsating last-eight tie 4-3 on aggregate.
Italian champions Inter will face Barcelona in the semis after goals in the space of three minutes from captain Lautaro Martinez and Benjamin Pavard canceled out a Harry Kane strike for Bayern which levelled the tie in the 52nd minute.
Eric Dier’s looping header in the 75th minute earned Bayern a draw on the night in soaking and blustery Milan but that wasn’t enough for Vincent Kompany’s side to continue their bid to be crowned Kings of Europe for a seventh time.
Simone Inzaghi’s side came through in awful conditions at the San Siro where a combination of heavy rain and driving winds affected both teams’ ability to play their best football, but added uncertainty and tension to an already highly-charged occasion.
Inter are still on for a repeat of the Serie A, Champions League and Italian Cup treble won under Jose Mourinho in 2010, as they are also three points ahead of Napoli in Italy’s top flight and face AC Milan in the semifinals of the domestic cup.
And Wednesday’s win showed that Inter are more than capable or reaching the final of Europe’s elite club competition, as they did two years ago when they were narrowly beaten by Manchester City.
Bayern had won all three of their previous Champions League away matches at Inter, but after Pavard crashed home his first goal for the club in the 61st minute there was no way back for the injury-hit Bundesliga leaders.
Inter will also benefit from playing the second leg of their showdown with Barca, who they beat in the semifinals on their way to victory in Madrid 15 years ago, at the San Siro.
The hosts didn’t come alive until their fans, who had been sat and stood in silence for the first 20 minutes in protest at ticket prices, burst loudly in song.
By that time the wind had picked up so much that one Inter cross almost swung back out of the penalty box, but even with the wind in their faces the hosts were on the up.
Thuram just failed to get a touch on Francesco Acerbi’s scuffed finish in the 29th minute, and moments later Hakan Calhanoglu crashed powerful shot just wide of the upright.
Bayern reacted and pushed Inter back into their own area for the final minutes of the opening half, but a combination of the conditions, desperate defending and poor finishing kept the match scoreless at the break.
Inter started the second half the stronger but Kane levelled the tie with a brilliantly taken goal, shifting onto his right and drilling a low shot through Federico Dimarco’s leg’s and past Yann Sommer.
Just moments before Kane had rookie Bayern goalkeeper to thank for stopping him scoring an own goal, but not long afterwards Martinez re-established Inter’s advantage when he controlled Dimarco’s corner and lashed home.
And Pavard decided the tie three minutes later with a bullet header against his former club from another corner, sending the San Siro wild with delight.
That wasn’t it though as Dier moved Bayern back to within a goal of extra-time, but when Sommer smothered Kane’s header in stoppage time Inter’s treble dream was kept alive.


Iran foreign minister says uranium enrichment ‘non-negotiable’

Iran foreign minister says uranium enrichment ‘non-negotiable’
Updated 17 April 2025
Follow

Iran foreign minister says uranium enrichment ‘non-negotiable’

Iran foreign minister says uranium enrichment ‘non-negotiable’
  • Remarks came after US envoy said Iran must stop its enrichment of uranium as part of any nuclear deal

TEHRAN: Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Wednesday that Iran’s enrichment of uranium as part of its nuclear program was “non-negotiable” after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff called for a halt.

“Iran’s enrichment is a real, accepted matter. We are ready to build confidence in response to possible concerns, but the issue of enrichment is non-negotiable,” Araghchi told reporters after a cabinet meeting.

The remarks came as Araghchi and Witkoff are due to meet again in Oman on Saturday, a week after they held the highest-level talks between the longtime foes since US President Donald Trump abandoned a landmark nuclear deal in 2018.

Trump reimposed sweeping sanctions in a policy of “maximum pressure” against Tehran that he has reinstated since returning to office in January.

In March, he sent a letter to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urging talks but warning of possible military action if they fail to produce a deal.

Both sides described Saturday’s meeting as “constructive.”

But on Tuesday, Witkoff said Iran must “stop and eliminate” its enrichment of uranium as part of any nuclear deal.

He had previously demanded only that Iran return to the 3.67 percent enrichment ceiling set by the 2015 accord between Iran and major powers that Trump withdrew from.

Araghchi condemned what he called the “contradictory and conflicting positions” coming out of the Trump administration ahead of Saturday’s talks.

“We will find out the true opinions of the Americans during the negotiation session,” he said.

Iran’s top diplomat said he hoped to start negotiations on the framework of a possible agreement but said that required “constructive positions” from the US.

“If we continue to (hear) contradictory and conflicting positions, we are going to have problems,” he warned.

Araghchi is set to head to Iranian ally Russia on Thursday, Iran’s ambassador in Moscow Kazem Jalili said.

Iran has said the visit was “pre-planned” but will include discussions on the Iran-US talks.

“The objective of (my) trip to Russia is to convey a written message from the supreme leader” to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Araghchi said.

In readiness for the US talks, Iran has engaged with Russia and China, which were both parties to the 2015 deal.

Ahead of Saturday’s second round of talks in Muscat, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said he hoped a deal could be reached with the US, the official IRNA news agency reported.

On Tuesday, Khamenei cautioned that while the talks have proceeded well in their early stages, they could still prove fruitless.

“The negotiations may or may not yield results,” he said, noting that Iran had already outlined its “red lines.”

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have said the country’s military capabilities are off-limits in the talks.

Late on Sunday, IRNA said Iran’s regional influence and its missile capabilities — both sources of concern for Western governments — were also among its “red lines.”

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi was due in Iran later Wednesday for talks with senior officials.

The UN watchdog was tasked with overseeing Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nulear deal.

In its latest report, the IAEA said Iran had an estimated 274.8 kilograms of uranium enriched to up to 60 percent.

That level far exceeds the the 3.67 percent ceiling set by the 2015 deal but still falls short of the 90 percent threshold required for a nuclear warhead.